RepoPilot

ggml-org/ggml vs shadps4-emu/shadps4

ggml-org/ggml shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, ggml shows healthier maintenance signals than shadps4. ggml rates Healthy overall while shadps4 rates Mixed. ggml last saw a commit 1 month ago with 51+ active contributors, while shadps4 last saw a commit 1 month ago with 19+ active contributors. ggml is MIT-licensed while shadps4 is GPL-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

ggml-org/ggml

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 51+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 22% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

shadps4-emu/shadps4

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit today
  • 19 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 18% of recent commits)
  • GPL-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

ggmlshadps4
Stars14,61031,040
Last commit1mo ago1mo ago
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
Open issues317139
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage17%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? ggml-org/ggml · shadps4-emu/shadps4

Ask AI about ggml-org/ggml vs shadps4-emu/shadps4

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.