RepoPilot

ggml-org/llama.cpp vs godotengine/godot

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, llama.cpp and godot both show healthy maintenance signals. llama.cpp was committed to 3 weeks ago with 47+ active contributors, while godot was committed to 3 weeks ago with 28+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

ggml-org/llama.cpp

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • 1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
  • Last commit today
  • 47+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 21% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

godotengine/godot

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 28+ active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

llama.cppgodot
Stars125,192116,050
Last commit21d ago22d ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues2,17018,766
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage16%19%
Dependency CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 lowNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? ggml-org/llama.cpp · godotengine/godot

Ask AI about ggml-org/llama.cpp vs godotengine/godot

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.