ggml-org/llama.cpp vs google/glog
ggml-org/llama.cpp shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, llama.cpp shows healthier maintenance signals than glog. llama.cpp rates Healthy overall while glog rates Mixed. llama.cpp was committed to today with 59+ active contributors, while glog last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors. llama.cpp is MIT-licensed while glog is BSD-3-Clause-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ggml-org/llama.cpp
Strong maintenance signals
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ⚠1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓59+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 12% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
google/glog
Slowing — last commit 12mo ago
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 12mo ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 12mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 12mo ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| llama.cpp | glog | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 128,488 | 7,365 |
| Last commit | today | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Open issues | 2,481 | 46 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 16% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 1 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ggml-org/llama.cpp · google/glog
Ask AI about ggml-org/llama.cpp vs google/glog
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.