ggml-org/llama.cpp vs snapchat/keydb
ggml-org/llama.cpp shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, llama.cpp shows healthier maintenance signals than keydb. llama.cpp rates Healthy overall while keydb rates Mixed. llama.cpp was committed to 2 days ago with 50+ active contributors, while keydb last saw a commit 2 years ago with 19+ active contributors. llama.cpp is MIT-licensed while keydb is BSD-3-Clause-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ggml-org/llama.cpp
Strong maintenance signals
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ⚠1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓50+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 9% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
snapchat/keydb
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| llama.cpp | keydb | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 128,131 | 12,474 |
| Last commit | 2d ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Open issues | 2,469 | 268 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 16% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 1 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ggml-org/llama.cpp · snapchat/keydb
Ask AI about ggml-org/llama.cpp vs snapchat/keydb
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.