ghostpack/rubeus vs huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, rubeus and revokemsgpatcher both show mixed maintenance signals. rubeus last saw a commit 3 months ago with 19+ active contributors, while revokemsgpatcher last saw a commit 1 month ago with 7+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ghostpack/rubeus
Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 41% of recent commits)
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 92% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| rubeus | revokemsgpatcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,151 | 38,564 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Unknown | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 48 | 58 |
| Has tests | No | No |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ghostpack/rubeus · huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher
Ask AI about ghostpack/rubeus vs huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.