gin-gonic/gin vs shazow/ssh-chat
gin-gonic/gin shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, gin shows healthier maintenance signals than ssh-chat. gin rates Healthy overall while ssh-chat rates Mixed. gin last saw a commit 1 month ago with 44+ active contributors, while ssh-chat last saw a commit 8 months ago with 15+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
gin-gonic/gin
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓44+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 25% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
shazow/ssh-chat
Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
test evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 73% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 4mo ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| gin | ssh-chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 89,099 | 5,887 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 8mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 761 | 54 |
| Has tests | ✓ | Unknown |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 71% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? gin-gonic/gin · shazow/ssh-chat
Ask AI about gin-gonic/gin vs shazow/ssh-chat
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.