githawkapp/githawk vs p0deje/maccy
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, githawk and maccy both show mixed maintenance signals. githawk last saw a commit 3 years ago with 19+ active contributors, while maccy last saw a commit 4 months ago with 6+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
githawkapp/githawk →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
p0deje/maccy →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| githawk | maccy | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 2,906 | 19,776 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 4mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 464 | 179 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? githawkapp/githawk · p0deje/maccy
Ask AI about githawkapp/githawk vs p0deje/maccy
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.