glanceapp/glance vs sourcegraph/conc
sourcegraph/conc shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, conc shows healthier maintenance signals than glance. conc rates Healthy overall while glance rates Mixed. glance was committed to 4 weeks ago with 12+ active contributors, while conc last saw a commit 1 month ago with 14+ active contributors. glance is AGPL-3.0-licensed while conc is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
glanceapp/glance →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 88% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
sourcegraph/conc →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 39% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| glance | conc | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 35,415 | 10,381 |
| Last commit | 28d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 326 | 29 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? glanceapp/glance · sourcegraph/conc
Ask AI about glanceapp/glance vs sourcegraph/conc
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.