RepoPilot

glanceapp/glance vs wei-shaw/sub2api

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, glance and sub2api both show mixed maintenance signals. glance was committed to 1 week ago with 17+ active contributors, while sub2api was committed to 1 week ago with 20+ active contributors. glance is AGPL-3.0-licensed while sub2api is LGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

glanceapp/glance

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 73% of recent commits
  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • 1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 17 active contributors
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

wei-shaw/sub2api

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (LGPL-3.0) — review compatibility

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
  • LGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 20 active contributors
  • LGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

glancesub2api
Stars36,89540,594
Last commit11d ago10d ago
LicenseAGPL-3.0LGPL-3.0
Open issues3153,080
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage5%100%
Dependency CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 lowNo CVEs
Architecture gradeAC
Cycles00
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? glanceapp/glance · wei-shaw/sub2api

Ask AI about glanceapp/glance vs wei-shaw/sub2api

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.