glushchenko/fsnotes vs reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa
reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, reactivecocoa shows healthier maintenance signals than fsnotes. reactivecocoa rates Healthy overall while fsnotes rates Mixed. fsnotes last saw a commit 2 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while reactivecocoa last saw a commit 9 months ago with 23+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
glushchenko/fsnotes →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 94% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓23+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 23% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fsnotes | reactivecocoa | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 7,358 | 19,845 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 9mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 2 | 11 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? glushchenko/fsnotes · reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa
Ask AI about glushchenko/fsnotes vs reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.