go-chi/chi vs gofiber/fiber
go-chi/chi shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, chi shows healthier maintenance signals than fiber. chi rates Healthy overall while fiber rates Mixed. chi was committed to 3 weeks ago with 56+ active contributors, while fiber was committed to 3 weeks ago with 7+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. chi has no known critical CVEs, while fiber has 1.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
go-chi/chi
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓56+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 14% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
gofiber/fiber
High-severity dependency advisories — review before adopting
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
1 high-severity CVE in dependencies; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠1 high-severity advisory on direct dependencies
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 40% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: resolve the high-severity advisory
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| chi | fiber | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 22,713 | 40,071 |
| Last commit | 23d ago | 22d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 84 | 56 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 44% | 69% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 1 high · 2 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? go-chi/chi · gofiber/fiber
Ask AI about go-chi/chi vs gofiber/fiber
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.