go-gitea/gitea vs turbot/steampipe
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, gitea and steampipe both show healthy maintenance signals. gitea was committed to 1 week ago with 29+ active contributors, while steampipe last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors. gitea is MIT-licensed while steampipe is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
go-gitea/gitea
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Scorecard: dangerous CI workflow (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓29+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 27% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
turbot/steampipe
Strong maintenance signals
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| gitea | steampipe | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 57,721 | 7,915 |
| Last commit | 11d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 2,522 | 21 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 90% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 2 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? go-gitea/gitea · turbot/steampipe
Ask AI about go-gitea/gitea vs turbot/steampipe
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.