go-kit/kit vs inconshreveable/ngrok
go-kit/kit shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, kit shows healthier maintenance signals than ngrok. kit rates Healthy overall while ngrok rates Mixed. kit last saw a commit 1 year ago with 26+ active contributors, while ngrok last saw a commit 2 years ago with 21+ active contributors. kit is MIT-licensed while ngrok is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
go-kit/kit →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
inconshreveable/ngrok →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 67% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| kit | ngrok | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 27,426 | 24,466 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 58 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 4% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? go-kit/kit · inconshreveable/ngrok
Ask AI about go-kit/kit vs inconshreveable/ngrok
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.