RepoPilot

go-vikunja/vikunja vs makeplane/plane

makeplane/plane shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, plane shows healthier maintenance signals than vikunja. plane rates Healthy overall while vikunja rates Mixed. vikunja was committed to 3 days ago with 6+ active contributors, while plane was committed to 2 weeks ago with 19+ active contributors. Both use the AGPL-3.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

go-vikunja/vikunja

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit today
  • 6 active contributors
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

makeplane/plane

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit today
  • 19 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

vikunjaplane
Stars5,38458,432
Last commit3d ago20d ago
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
Open issues2351,070
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage60%2%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? go-vikunja/vikunja · makeplane/plane

Ask AI about go-vikunja/vikunja vs makeplane/plane

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.