go-vikunja/vikunja vs mattermost/focalboard
mattermost/focalboard shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, focalboard shows healthier maintenance signals than vikunja. focalboard rates Healthy overall while vikunja rates Mixed. vikunja was committed to 3 days ago with 6+ active contributors, while focalboard last saw a commit 4 months ago with 32+ active contributors. vikunja is AGPL-3.0-licensed while focalboard is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
go-vikunja/vikunja
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
mattermost/focalboard
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓32+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| vikunja | focalboard | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,384 | 26,437 |
| Last commit | 3d ago | 4mo ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 235 | 784 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 60% | 35% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? go-vikunja/vikunja · mattermost/focalboard
Ask AI about go-vikunja/vikunja vs mattermost/focalboard
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.