gofiber/fiber vs valyala/fasthttp
valyala/fasthttp shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, fasthttp shows healthier maintenance signals than fiber. fasthttp rates Healthy overall while fiber rates Mixed. fiber was committed to 3 weeks ago with 7+ active contributors, while fasthttp last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. fasthttp has no known critical CVEs, while fiber has 1.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
gofiber/fiber
High-severity dependency advisories — review before adopting
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
1 high-severity CVE in dependencies; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠1 high-severity advisory on direct dependencies
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 40% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: resolve the high-severity advisory
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
valyala/fasthttp
Strong maintenance signals
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ⚠1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fiber | fasthttp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 40,071 | 23,439 |
| Last commit | 26d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 56 | 90 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 69% | 86% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 1 high · 2 moderate · 0 low | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? gofiber/fiber · valyala/fasthttp
Ask AI about gofiber/fiber vs valyala/fasthttp
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.