google-gemini/gemini-cli vs ruvnet/ruflo
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, gemini-cli and ruflo both show healthy maintenance signals. gemini-cli was committed to today with 17+ active contributors, while ruflo was committed to today with 8+ active contributors. gemini-cli is Apache-2.0-licensed while ruflo is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
google-gemini/gemini-cli
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 21% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
ruvnet/ruflo
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 88% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| gemini-cli | ruflo | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 107,022 | 72,643 |
| Last commit | today | today |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 845 | 971 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 76% | 33% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? google-gemini/gemini-cli · ruvnet/ruflo
Ask AI about google-gemini/gemini-cli vs ruvnet/ruflo
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.