google/exoplayer vs jz-darkal/androidhttpcapture
jz-darkal/androidhttpcapture shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, androidhttpcapture shows healthier maintenance signals than exoplayer. androidhttpcapture rates Healthy overall while exoplayer rates Mixed. exoplayer last saw a commit 6 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while androidhttpcapture last saw a commit 1 month ago with 3+ active contributors. exoplayer is Apache-2.0-licensed while androidhttpcapture is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
google/exoplayer →
Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 27% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
jz-darkal/androidhttpcapture →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| exoplayer | androidhttpcapture | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,921 | 4,590 |
| Last commit | 6mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 631 | 42 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? google/exoplayer · jz-darkal/androidhttpcapture
Ask AI about google/exoplayer vs jz-darkal/androidhttpcapture
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.