google/exoplayer vs signalapp/signal-server
signalapp/signal-server shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, signal-server shows healthier maintenance signals than exoplayer. signal-server rates Healthy overall while exoplayer rates Mixed. exoplayer last saw a commit 8 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while signal-server was committed to 3 weeks ago with 8+ active contributors. exoplayer is Apache-2.0-licensed while signal-server is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
google/exoplayer
Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
no CI workflows detected; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 9mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 9mo ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 27% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
signalapp/signal-server
Strong maintenance signals
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| exoplayer | signal-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,937 | 10,683 |
| Last commit | 8mo ago | 22d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 627 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 45% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? google/exoplayer · signalapp/signal-server
Ask AI about google/exoplayer vs signalapp/signal-server
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.