google/grumpy vs nsqio/nsq
nsqio/nsq shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, nsq shows healthier maintenance signals than grumpy. nsq rates Healthy overall while grumpy rates Mixed. grumpy last saw a commit 4 years ago with 7+ active contributors, while nsq last saw a commit 11 months ago with 20+ active contributors. grumpy is Apache-2.0-licensed while nsq is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
google/grumpy →
Stale — last commit 4y ago
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 45% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
nsqio/nsq →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 10mo ago
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| grumpy | nsq | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 10,505 | 25,727 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 11mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 80 | 74 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 30% | 24% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? google/grumpy · nsqio/nsq
Ask AI about google/grumpy vs nsqio/nsq
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.