googleapis/mcp-toolbox vs heroiclabs/nakama
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, mcp-toolbox and nakama both show healthy maintenance signals. mcp-toolbox was committed to 2 weeks ago with 33+ active contributors, while nakama was committed to 2 weeks ago with 15+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
googleapis/mcp-toolbox
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected…
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓33+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 16% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
heroiclabs/nakama
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mcp-toolbox | nakama | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16,262 | 13,254 |
| Last commit | 17d ago | 19d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 245 | 130 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | A | A |
| Cycles | 1 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? googleapis/mcp-toolbox · heroiclabs/nakama
Ask AI about googleapis/mcp-toolbox vs heroiclabs/nakama
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.