goproxyio/goproxy vs v2ray/v2ray-core
v2ray/v2ray-core shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, v2ray-core shows healthier maintenance signals than goproxy. v2ray-core rates Healthy overall while goproxy rates Mixed. goproxy last saw a commit 2 years ago with 30+ active contributors, while v2ray-core last saw a commit 2 months ago with 11+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
goproxyio/goproxy →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
v2ray/v2ray-core →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| goproxy | v2ray-core | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,873 | 46,849 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 2mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 18 | 18 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 33% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? goproxyio/goproxy · v2ray/v2ray-core
Ask AI about goproxyio/goproxy vs v2ray/v2ray-core
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.