RepoPilot

grafana/k6 vs ollama/ollama

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, k6 and ollama both show healthy maintenance signals. k6 was committed to 2 weeks ago with 26+ active contributors, while ollama was committed to 1 week ago with 10+ active contributors. k6 is AGPL-3.0-licensed while ollama is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

grafana/k6

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 26+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

ollama/ollama

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 2 cyclic import chains detected

  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 10 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 39% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

k6ollama
Stars31,375180,253
Last commit14d ago12d ago
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
Open issues8053,906
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage13%62%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeAA
Cycles02
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? grafana/k6 · ollama/ollama

Ask AI about grafana/k6 vs ollama/ollama

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.