grasscutters/grasscutter vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
lmax-exchange/disruptor shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, disruptor shows healthier maintenance signals than grasscutter. disruptor rates Healthy overall while grasscutter rates Mixed. grasscutter last saw a commit 3 months ago with 23+ active contributors, while disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors. grasscutter is AGPL-3.0-licensed while disruptor is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
grasscutters/grasscutter →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓23+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 30% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
lmax-exchange/disruptor →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| grasscutter | disruptor | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16,753 | 18,326 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 150 | 17 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 41% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? grasscutters/grasscutter · lmax-exchange/disruptor
Ask AI about grasscutters/grasscutter vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.