grasscutters/grasscutter vs scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, grasscutter and smartrefreshlayout both show mixed maintenance signals. grasscutter last saw a commit 6 months ago with 23+ active contributors, while smartrefreshlayout last saw a commit 1 year ago with 8+ active contributors. grasscutter is AGPL-3.0-licensed while smartrefreshlayout is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
grasscutters/grasscutter
Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 6mo ago
- ✓23+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 30% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 52% of recent commits
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| grasscutter | smartrefreshlayout | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16,804 | 25,159 |
| Last commit | 6mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 152 | 341 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | Unknown |
| Test coverage | 0% | 72% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? grasscutters/grasscutter · scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Ask AI about grasscutters/grasscutter vs scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.