greenrobot/eventbus vs theonedev/onedev
greenrobot/eventbus shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, eventbus shows healthier maintenance signals than onedev. eventbus rates Healthy overall while onedev rates Mixed. eventbus last saw a commit 2 years ago with 5+ active contributors, while onedev last saw a commit 1 month ago with 1+ active contributor. eventbus is Apache-2.0-licensed while onedev is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
greenrobot/eventbus →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
theonedev/onedev →
Solo project — review before adopting
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| eventbus | onedev | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,728 | 14,969 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 147 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 14% | 11% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? greenrobot/eventbus · theonedev/onedev
Ask AI about greenrobot/eventbus vs theonedev/onedev
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.