greenrobot/eventbus vs wdullaer/materialdatetimepicker
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, eventbus and materialdatetimepicker both show healthy maintenance signals. eventbus last saw a commit 2 years ago with 5+ active contributors, while materialdatetimepicker last saw a commit 3 years ago with 10+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
greenrobot/eventbus →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
wdullaer/materialdatetimepicker →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 80% of recent commits
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| eventbus | materialdatetimepicker | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,728 | 4,637 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 3y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 147 | 110 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 14% | 34% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? greenrobot/eventbus · wdullaer/materialdatetimepicker
Ask AI about greenrobot/eventbus vs wdullaer/materialdatetimepicker
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.