greenrobot/greendao vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
lmax-exchange/disruptor shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, disruptor shows healthier maintenance signals than greendao. disruptor rates Healthy overall while greendao rates Concerns. greendao last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors, while disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
greenrobot/greendao →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 64% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
lmax-exchange/disruptor →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| greendao | disruptor | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12,602 | 18,326 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1y ago |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 237 | 17 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 41% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? greenrobot/greendao · lmax-exchange/disruptor
Ask AI about greenrobot/greendao vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.