grishka/neardrop vs reactivex/rxswift
reactivex/rxswift shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, rxswift shows healthier maintenance signals than neardrop. rxswift rates Healthy overall while neardrop rates Mixed. neardrop last saw a commit 3 months ago with 26+ active contributors, while rxswift last saw a commit 2 months ago with 45+ active contributors. neardrop is Unlicense-licensed while rxswift is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
grishka/neardrop →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 63% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Unlicense licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
reactivex/rxswift →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓45+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| neardrop | rxswift | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,087 | 24,644 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | Unlicense | MIT |
| Open issues | 89 | 10 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? grishka/neardrop · reactivex/rxswift
Ask AI about grishka/neardrop vs reactivex/rxswift
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.