grobidorg/grobid vs yuliskov/smarttube
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, grobid and smarttube both show mixed maintenance signals. grobid last saw a commit 4 months ago with 6+ active contributors, while smarttube was committed to 1 week ago with 8+ active contributors. grobid is Apache-2.0-licensed while smarttube is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
grobidorg/grobid
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 94% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yuliskov/smarttube
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| grobid | smarttube | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,849 | 32,681 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 9d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 337 | 698 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 74% | 28% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? grobidorg/grobid · yuliskov/smarttube
Ask AI about grobidorg/grobid vs yuliskov/smarttube
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.