grpc/grpc-web vs paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation
grpc/grpc-web shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, grpc-web shows healthier maintenance signals than webgl-fluid-simulation. grpc-web rates Healthy overall while webgl-fluid-simulation rates Mixed. grpc-web last saw a commit 4 months ago with 26+ active contributors, while webgl-fluid-simulation last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors. grpc-web is Apache-2.0-licensed while webgl-fluid-simulation is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
grpc/grpc-web →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 64% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| grpc-web | webgl-fluid-simulation | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,205 | 16,309 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 188 | 76 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? grpc/grpc-web · paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation
Ask AI about grpc/grpc-web vs paveldogreat/webgl-fluid-simulation
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.