RepoPilot

grvydev/project-lightspeed vs ruvnet/ruview

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, project-lightspeed and ruview both show mixed maintenance signals. project-lightspeed last saw a commit 3 years ago with 11+ active contributors, while ruview was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

grvydev/project-lightspeed

Mixed

Stale — last commit 3y ago

MixedDependency

last commit was 3y ago; test evidence incomplete…

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 3y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Stale — last commit 3y ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 72% of recent commits
  • 11 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

ruvnet/ruview

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected

  • Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 2 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

project-lightspeedruview
Stars3,66992,443
Last commit3y ago13d ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues44613
Has testsUnknown
Has CI
Test coverage0%24%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeA
Cycles1
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? grvydev/project-lightspeed · ruvnet/ruview

Ask AI about grvydev/project-lightspeed vs ruvnet/ruview

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.