RepoPilot

guillaume-be/rust-bert vs rustdesk/rustdesk

rustdesk/rustdesk shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, rustdesk shows healthier maintenance signals than rust-bert. rustdesk rates Healthy overall while rust-bert rates Mixed. rust-bert last saw a commit 8 months ago with 33+ active contributors, while rustdesk was committed to 3 days ago with 32+ active contributors. rust-bert is Apache-2.0-licensed while rustdesk is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

guillaume-be/rust-bert

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 4mo ago

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
  • Last commit 4mo ago
  • 33+ active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

rustdesk/rustdesk

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 4 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling

  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 32+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

rust-bertrustdesk
Stars3,058123,381
Last commit8mo ago3d ago
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
Open issues74164
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage14%6%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 2 moderate · 0 low
Architecture gradeB
Cycles4
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? guillaume-be/rust-bert · rustdesk/rustdesk

Ask AI about guillaume-be/rust-bert vs rustdesk/rustdesk

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.