gyulyvgc/sniffnet vs vercel-labs/agent-browser
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, sniffnet and agent-browser both show healthy maintenance signals. sniffnet was committed to 5 days ago with 14+ active contributors, while agent-browser was committed to 1 week ago with 17+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
gyulyvgc/sniffnet →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
vercel-labs/agent-browser →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| sniffnet | agent-browser | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 37,949 | 35,081 |
| Last commit | 5d ago | 8d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 68 | 501 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 7% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 3 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | A |
| Cycles | 8 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? gyulyvgc/sniffnet · vercel-labs/agent-browser
Ask AI about gyulyvgc/sniffnet vs vercel-labs/agent-browser
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.