RepoPilot

gzc/clrs vs shadps4-emu/shadps4

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, clrs and shadps4 both show mixed maintenance signals. clrs last saw a commit 2 years ago with 26+ active contributors, while shadps4 last saw a commit 1 month ago with 19+ active contributors. clrs is MIT-licensed while shadps4 is GPL-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

gzc/clrs

Mixed

Stale — last commit 3y ago

MixedDependency

last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected

  • Stale — last commit 3y ago
  • No CI workflows detected
  • 26+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

shadps4-emu/shadps4

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit today
  • 19 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 18% of recent commits)
  • GPL-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

clrsshadps4
Stars9,59831,040
Last commit2y ago1mo ago
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
Open issues85139
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage3%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? gzc/clrs · shadps4-emu/shadps4

Ask AI about gzc/clrs vs shadps4-emu/shadps4

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.