gzu-liyujiang/androidpicker vs jakewharton/butterknife
jakewharton/butterknife shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, butterknife shows healthier maintenance signals than androidpicker. butterknife rates Healthy overall while androidpicker rates Mixed. androidpicker last saw a commit 3 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while butterknife last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors. androidpicker is Other-licensed while butterknife is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
gzu-liyujiang/androidpicker →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); top contributor handles 96% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
jakewharton/butterknife →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| androidpicker | butterknife | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,774 | 25,377 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 195 | 119 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 57% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? gzu-liyujiang/androidpicker · jakewharton/butterknife
Ask AI about gzu-liyujiang/androidpicker vs jakewharton/butterknife
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.