h07000223/flycotablayout vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro
yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ruoyi-vue-pro shows healthier maintenance signals than flycotablayout. ruoyi-vue-pro rates Healthy overall while flycotablayout rates Concerns. flycotablayout last saw a commit 3 years ago with 1+ active contributor, while ruoyi-vue-pro last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
h07000223/flycotablayout →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
last commit was 3y ago; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| flycotablayout | ruoyi-vue-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11,105 | 37,021 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 370 | 3 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 32% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? h07000223/flycotablayout · yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro
Ask AI about h07000223/flycotablayout vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.