halfrost/leetcode-go vs spf13/cobra
spf13/cobra shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, cobra shows healthier maintenance signals than leetcode-go. cobra rates Healthy overall while leetcode-go rates Mixed. leetcode-go was committed to 2 days ago with 8+ active contributors, while cobra last saw a commit 2 months ago with 51+ active contributors. leetcode-go is MIT-licensed while cobra is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
halfrost/leetcode-go →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
spf13/cobra →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓51+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 11% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| leetcode-go | cobra | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,785 | 43,893 |
| Last commit | 2d ago | 2mo ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 5 | 363 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? halfrost/leetcode-go · spf13/cobra
Ask AI about halfrost/leetcode-go vs spf13/cobra
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.