hanks-zyh/htextview vs jakewharton/butterknife
jakewharton/butterknife shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, butterknife shows healthier maintenance signals than htextview. butterknife rates Healthy overall while htextview rates Mixed. htextview last saw a commit 5 years ago with 14+ active contributors, while butterknife last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
hanks-zyh/htextview →
Stale — last commit 5y ago
last commit was 5y ago; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 70% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
jakewharton/butterknife →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| htextview | butterknife | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,647 | 25,377 |
| Last commit | 5y ago | 2y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 44 | 119 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 37% | 57% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? hanks-zyh/htextview · jakewharton/butterknife
Ask AI about hanks-zyh/htextview vs jakewharton/butterknife
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.