haoel/leetcode vs hyprwm/hyprland
hyprwm/hyprland shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hyprland shows healthier maintenance signals than leetcode. hyprland rates Healthy overall while leetcode rates Concerns. leetcode last saw a commit 2 years ago with 8+ active contributors, while hyprland last saw a commit 1 month ago with 30+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
haoel/leetcode →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓8 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.); 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
hyprwm/hyprland →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| leetcode | hyprland | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,052 | 35,578 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | — | BSD-3-Clause |
| Open issues | 55 | 185 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 23% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? haoel/leetcode · hyprwm/hyprland
Ask AI about haoel/leetcode vs hyprwm/hyprland
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.