RepoPilot

hapijs/hapi vs koajs/koa

koajs/koa shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, koa shows healthier maintenance signals than hapi. koa rates Healthy overall while hapi rates Mixed. hapi last saw a commit 1 month ago with 21+ active contributors, while koa last saw a commit 1 month ago with 25+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

hapijs/hapi

Mixed

Evidence incomplete — review before adopting

MixedDependency

license evidence incomplete

MixedFork & modify

license evidence incomplete

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…

  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
  • Last commit 4w ago
  • 21+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

koajs/koa

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Last commit 1w ago
  • 25+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

hapikoa
Stars14,79235,687
Last commit1mo ago1mo ago
LicenseUnknownMIT
Open issues5643
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage71%100%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? hapijs/hapi · koajs/koa

Ask AI about hapijs/hapi vs koajs/koa

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.