heeexy/springboot-shiro-vue vs hollischuang/tobetopjavaer
heeexy/springboot-shiro-vue shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, springboot-shiro-vue shows stronger maintenance signals than tobetopjavaer. springboot-shiro-vue rates Mixed overall while tobetopjavaer rates Concerns. springboot-shiro-vue last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors, while tobetopjavaer last saw a commit 2 years ago with 15+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
heeexy/springboot-shiro-vue →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 96% of recent commits; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%); add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
hollischuang/tobetopjavaer →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 34% of recent commits)
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| springboot-shiro-vue | tobetopjavaer | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,671 | 25,426 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | — |
| Open issues | 7 | 61 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? heeexy/springboot-shiro-vue · hollischuang/tobetopjavaer
Ask AI about heeexy/springboot-shiro-vue vs hollischuang/tobetopjavaer
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.