herotransitions/hero vs relatedcode/progresshud
herotransitions/hero shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hero shows healthier maintenance signals than progresshud. hero rates Healthy overall while progresshud rates Mixed. hero last saw a commit 1 year ago with 26+ active contributors, while progresshud last saw a commit 5 months ago with 7+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
herotransitions/hero →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 62% of recent commits
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
relatedcode/progresshud →
Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
top contributor handles 91% of recent commits; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%); add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hero | progresshud | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 22,452 | 2,966 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 5mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 42 | 12 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? herotransitions/hero · relatedcode/progresshud
Ask AI about herotransitions/hero vs relatedcode/progresshud
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.