hollischuang/tobetopjavaer vs iluwatar/java-design-patterns
iluwatar/java-design-patterns shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, java-design-patterns shows healthier maintenance signals than tobetopjavaer. java-design-patterns rates Healthy overall while tobetopjavaer rates Mixed. tobetopjavaer last saw a commit 2 years ago with 15+ active contributors, while java-design-patterns was committed to 2 weeks ago with 34+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
hollischuang/tobetopjavaer
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; no tests detected in the complete Git tree…
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 34% of recent commits)
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- •Fork & modify Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
iluwatar/java-design-patterns
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4d ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| tobetopjavaer | java-design-patterns | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,340 | 94,651 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 16d ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 61 | 128 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 47% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? hollischuang/tobetopjavaer · iluwatar/java-design-patterns
Ask AI about hollischuang/tobetopjavaer vs iluwatar/java-design-patterns
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.