RepoPilot

hollischuang/tobetopjavaer vs nayuki/qr-code-generator

Both showing Concerns signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, tobetopjavaer and qr-code-generator both show concerning maintenance signals. tobetopjavaer last saw a commit 2 years ago with 15+ active contributors, while qr-code-generator last saw a commit 1 year ago with 2+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

hollischuang/tobetopjavaer

Concerns

Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No test directory detected
  • 15 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 34% of recent commits)

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

nayuki/qr-code-generator

Concerns

Stale and unlicensed — last commit 1y ago

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear; last commit was 1y ago…

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 1y ago…

  • Stale — last commit 1y ago
  • Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No test directory detected
  • 2 active contributors

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.); 1 commit in the last 365 days
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

tobetopjavaerqr-code-generator
Stars25,4266,567
Last commit2y ago1y ago
License
Open issues6112
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineConcerns signalsConcerns signals

Want the full analysis? hollischuang/tobetopjavaer · nayuki/qr-code-generator

Ask AI about hollischuang/tobetopjavaer vs nayuki/qr-code-generator

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.