hollischuang/tobetopjavaer vs raphw/byte-buddy
raphw/byte-buddy shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, byte-buddy shows healthier maintenance signals than tobetopjavaer. byte-buddy rates Healthy overall while tobetopjavaer rates Concerns. tobetopjavaer last saw a commit 2 years ago with 15+ active contributors, while byte-buddy last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
hollischuang/tobetopjavaer →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 34% of recent commits)
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
raphw/byte-buddy →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| tobetopjavaer | byte-buddy | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,426 | 6,822 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 61 | 33 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 30% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? hollischuang/tobetopjavaer · raphw/byte-buddy
Ask AI about hollischuang/tobetopjavaer vs raphw/byte-buddy
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.