homebrew/brew vs ryanb/ruby-warrior
homebrew/brew shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, brew shows healthier maintenance signals than ruby-warrior. brew rates Healthy overall while ruby-warrior rates Mixed. brew was committed to 1 week ago with 12+ active contributors, while ruby-warrior last saw a commit 2 years ago with 13+ active contributors. brew is BSD-2-Clause-licensed while ruby-warrior is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
homebrew/brew
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 39% of recent commits)
- ✓BSD-2-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
ryanb/ruby-warrior
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| brew | ruby-warrior | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 49,466 | 3,889 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 2y ago |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Open issues | 10 | 40 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 77% | 75% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? homebrew/brew · ryanb/ruby-warrior
Ask AI about homebrew/brew vs ryanb/ruby-warrior
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.