homebrew/homebrew-cask vs slim-template/slim
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, homebrew-cask and slim both show healthy maintenance signals. homebrew-cask last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors, while slim last saw a commit 3 months ago with 19+ active contributors. homebrew-cask is BSD-2-Clause-licensed while slim is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
homebrew/homebrew-cask →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓BSD-2-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
slim-template/slim →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 76% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 6w ago
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| homebrew-cask | slim | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 22,008 | 5,361 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 3mo ago |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Open issues | 32 | 17 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? homebrew/homebrew-cask · slim-template/slim
Ask AI about homebrew/homebrew-cask vs slim-template/slim
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.