RepoPilot

homebrew/homebrew-cask vs trashuwu/pokeassistant

homebrew/homebrew-cask shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, homebrew-cask shows healthier maintenance signals than pokeassistant. homebrew-cask rates Healthy overall while pokeassistant rates Mixed. homebrew-cask last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors, while pokeassistant last saw a commit 8 months ago with 3+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

homebrew/homebrew-cask

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit today
  • 4 active contributors
  • BSD-2-Clause licensed
  • CI configured

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

trashuwu/pokeassistant

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 7mo ago

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 7mo ago

  • Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
  • Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • Last commit 7mo ago
  • 3 active contributors
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

homebrew-caskpokeassistant
Stars22,0082,478
Last commit1mo ago8mo ago
LicenseBSD-2-Clause
Open issues322
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%100%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? homebrew/homebrew-cask · trashuwu/pokeassistant

Ask AI about homebrew/homebrew-cask vs trashuwu/pokeassistant

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.