homebrew/homebrew-cask vs urbanadventurer/whatweb
homebrew/homebrew-cask shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, homebrew-cask shows healthier maintenance signals than whatweb. homebrew-cask rates Healthy overall while whatweb rates Mixed. homebrew-cask last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors, while whatweb last saw a commit 2 months ago with 11+ active contributors. homebrew-cask is BSD-2-Clause-licensed while whatweb is GPL-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
homebrew/homebrew-cask →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓BSD-2-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
urbanadventurer/whatweb →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓GPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| homebrew-cask | whatweb | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 22,008 | 6,573 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Open issues | 32 | 50 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? homebrew/homebrew-cask · urbanadventurer/whatweb
Ask AI about homebrew/homebrew-cask vs urbanadventurer/whatweb
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.